MSRT, Noormagz, Civilica, Magiran, ...

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 PhD student in Criminal Law and Criminology, Azad University, North Tehran Branch, Iran

2 Master of Laws, Department of Criminal Law and Criminology, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

3 Assistant Professor, Law Department, University of Tehran-North, PhD in Criminal Law and Criminology, Faculty Member, Tehran-North Azad University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

In some cases, the innate nature of criminal act is punishable regardless of realization or non-realization of any result, and in this sense, to realize the criminal responsibility, there needs causality relationship, since the relationship always requires two parties (i.e. behavior and result) and when result is not essential, the existence of a causal relationship will not be necessary. In some crimes where obtaining a criminal result is essential for its realization, three conditions are required for the realization of criminal responsibility: (i) the presence of criminal behavior, (ii) occurrence of a harmful incident, and (iii) existence of causal relationship between criminal behavior and harmful event. It is feasible to explore and prove causal relationship in some cases, especially when an agent was involved in the result realization, as someone killing somebody by a gun. Instead of providing a vivid and decisive rule, the 2012 Islamic Penal Code attempted to provide some solutions by taking certain situations and conditions into account. Given that, in transverse case of stewardess multiplicity, the result is taken into account of all parameters, and in the longitudinal case, the last stewardess may be the guarantor, the first stewardess, or even both. Besides, in the multiplicity assumption of causes transversely, equal responsibility has been ordered, and in case of longitudinal involvement, provided the unintentional crime, the primary stewardess has been mainly affected

Keywords

Main Subjects

OPEN ACCESS

©2024 The author(s). This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

PUBLISHER NOTE

Sami Publishing Company remains neutral concerning jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

CURRENT PUBLISHER

Sami Publishing Company

  1. Ardabili, Mohammad Ali. (2012). General Criminal Law, Volume 2, Tehran, Mizan Publications.
  2. Aghaei Nia, Hossein. (2007). Crimes against persons (crimes) Tehran, Mizan Publications, third edition.
  3. Pourbafarani, Hassan. (2013). The unity or duality of tasbib in civil and criminal law, article 2, period 11, number 2.
  4. Jafari Langroudi, Mohammad Jaafar. (2007). Legal Terminology, Tehran, Ganj Danesh Publications, 17th and 19th editions. p. 142.
  5. Khomeini, Ruhollah. (2003). Tahrir al-Usila, Kitab al-Qasas, Institute for Organizing and Publishing the Works of Imam Khomeini (pbuh), Volume 2.
  6. Doakhan, Seyedreza; Zare Mehrjardi, Ali. (2012). The cause and the steward and its relationship with the spread of crimes, place of publication: the first national conference on lawyering, ethics, jurisprudence and law.
  7. Rostami Ghazani, Omid; Vaezi, Reza. (2013). Subsidiary Punishment in Imamiyyah Jurisprudence, Tehran, Judicial Law Perspectives Quarterly, No. 55.
  8. Zeraat, Abbas. (2012). "Distinguishing the state of spiritual multiplicity of crimes from similar titles", Tehran University Law Quarterly, Volume 43, No. 3.
  9. Zeraat, Abbas. (2012). A Brief Description of the New Islamic Penal Code, Tehran, Ghoqnos Publications.
  10. Sadeghi, Mohammad Hadi. (2010). Special criminal law (crimes against persons and physical integrity), Mizan Publications.
  11. Mir Mohammad Sadeghi, Hossein. (2013). The association of cause and effect in Islamic Penal Code 2013, Journal of Legal Studies of Shiraz University, 6th volume, 2nd issue.
  12. Najib Hosni, Mahmoud. (2011). The relationship of causation in criminal law, second edition, Mashhad, Razavi University of Islamic Sciences.
  13. Naqibi, Abulqasem. (2007). A comparative study of the damage assessment criterion in the assumption of multiple causes of damage in Islamic law" Law and Political Science Quarterly.
  14. Momeni, S., Geravandi, F., khosravi, A. (2021). 'Responsibility of effective factors in surgery in Iranian law with a look at the teachings of jurisprudence', Journal of Law and Political Studies, 1(1), pp. 1-14. doi: 10.22034/jlps.2021.1.1
  15. Momeni, S. (2022). 'Criminal Liability for Abetting and Prosecuting a Crime', Journal of Law and Political Studies, 2(1), pp. 85-93. doi: 10.22034/jlps.2022.1.6

Momeni, S., Mirzabeigi, M. (2022). 'The Place of Mortgage and Security in Intellectual Property Rights in Iran', International Journal of Advanced Studies in Humanities and Social Science, 11(2), pp. 142-148. doi: 10.22034/ijashss.2022.2.8