Document Type : Original Article

Authors

• Iman Madaniyan ¹
• Mohammad Reza Elahi Manesh ²

¹ PhD student in criminal law and criminology, Islamic Azad University, North Tehran branch, Tehran, Iran

² Assistant Professor, Law Department, University of Tehran-North, PhD in Criminal Law and Criminology, Faculty Member, Tehran-North Azad University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Background and purpose: With regard to the approval of the procedural law approved in 2012, which was a step forward during these few years, it is possible to see more and more attention to the plaintiff's rights in this law. In the new law, the legislator has considered rights for the plaintiff, such as protection of the plaintiff against confrontation with the accused, protection of the plaintiff's identity, the right to benefit from compensation and the right to protect the plaintiff against threats, each of these components is a kind of moderation in the field of recognition. Knowing the rights of the plaintiff. Method: According to the nature of the topic and the intended goals, the present research is qualitative in terms of type and descriptive and analytical in terms of method and is based on explanation, explanation, explanation and reasoning based on the materials extracted from the sources.
Findings: In the case of the plaintiff's request, if the prosecutor or the investigating officer deems the study or access to all or some of the documents in the case to be contrary to the necessity of discovering the truth, he will issue an order rejecting the request, stating the reason. The decision to reject the request mentioned in the previous point is communicated to the plaintiff in person and can be challenged in the competent court within three days. The court is obliged to consider the objection and make a decision in extraordinary time. The court's decision is final. Results: It is possible to explain the rights and criminal laws of Iran and compare the rights and powers of the plaintiff in criminal proceedings and provide the necessary suggestions in order to eliminate the defects. After explaining the situation of the plaintiff and examining the rights and powers of the plaintiff, the researcher tries to investigate the existing situation in the protection of the plaintiff in the process of proceedings, although the most worthy of comment in this process is the initial stages of the process, i.e. the entry of a person as a plaintiff. However, the plaintiff's rights have been examined in other stages and in the rules of procedure approved in 1392

Keywords

• Criminal policy
• Community participatory approach
• Collaborative criminal policy
• Criminal procedure

Main Subjects

• Criminal Law and Criminology

OPEN ACCESS

©2024 The author(s). This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

PUBLISHER NOTE

Sami Publishing Company remains neutral concerning jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

CURRENT PUBLISHER

Sami Publishing Company