Department of Private Law
Marzieh Babazadeh Namini
Abstract
Failure to provide information or to provide a lot of information can be negative and deterrent; therefore, the necessity of providing information is very important, and information must be provided that they are necessary, and the drug without it becomes a dangerous commodity. In English law and consumer ...
Read More
Failure to provide information or to provide a lot of information can be negative and deterrent; therefore, the necessity of providing information is very important, and information must be provided that they are necessary, and the drug without it becomes a dangerous commodity. In English law and consumer rights protection law, the manufacturer of the final product is usually the one who takes responsibility as the manufacturer. But the manufacturer of the defective component is responsible for the damage caused by the resulting defective product, as well as the person composing the material, is deemed by the manufacturer. In Iran's law, the responsibility for compensating the consumer is determined by the responsible authority of the person or legal person, whether private or public, which has caused the user to enter the damage and harm. This research uses a descriptive-analytic method to study the comparative study of civil liability caused by the actuarial disadvantages of drugs in Iranian law with a view to English law. The results show that the civil liability of Iran and the UK are apparently different. In England, unlike Iranian law, deliberately and unwittingly, they are two independent lawsuits for civil liability. Compensation for mistakes, misdemeanors and neglect the pharmacists' offices in the delivery of medicines are subject to the responsibility of the insurance professional of pharmacy and drag companies, according to the doctor's dossier. According to the Teshibod rule, pharmacists are known as guarantors for consumers and are responsible for compensating them for damages.
Department of Criminal Law and Criminology
Sajjad Momeni; Firozeh Geravandi; Ahmad khosravi
Abstract
Background: The civil liability of the physician is of high significance as one of the issues argued in the civil liability and private law. Civil liability in Iranian law, based on the majority of jurisprudence, is relied on the theory of loss and causation. Accordingly, most jurists have justified ...
Read More
Background: The civil liability of the physician is of high significance as one of the issues argued in the civil liability and private law. Civil liability in Iranian law, based on the majority of jurisprudence, is relied on the theory of loss and causation. Accordingly, most jurists have justified the physician’s liability by relying on these two rules.
Materials and Methods: In this study, all articles published up to the winter 2021 in Persian on the liability of the influential factors in surgery with view to jurisprudence teachings were reviewed. By searching databases, Quarterly Journal of Medical Law, Iranian Journal of Surgery, sid. ir, Quarterly Journal of Medical Jurisprudence and Civilica Publications, Quarterly Journal of Private Law Research, through keywords as civil liability, Islamic jurisprudence, commitment and liability of physician, medical error and criminal liability, these articles were obtained. It has also been derived from reliable scientific journals from the above-mentioned articles and websites.
Findings: According to law historical course on physician’s liability in Iranian law, based on 2013 Penal Code, if the physician is not at fault in science and practice, there is no guarantee for him, even if he has not been acquitted (paragraph 1 of Article 495); indeed, the new penal code has adopted guilt basis.
