MSRT, Noormagz, Civilica, Magiran, ...

Document Type : Review Article

Author

Master of Law, Private Law, Islamic Azad University, Kish International Branch, Iran

Abstract

Failure to provide information or to provide a lot of information can be negative and deterrent; therefore, the necessity of providing information is very important, and information must be provided that they are necessary, and the drug without it becomes a dangerous commodity. In English law and consumer rights protection law, the manufacturer of the final product is usually the one who takes responsibility as the manufacturer. But the manufacturer of the defective component is responsible for the damage caused by the resulting defective product, as well as the person composing the material, is deemed by the manufacturer. In Iran's law, the responsibility for compensating the consumer is determined by the responsible authority of the person or legal person, whether private or public, which has caused the user to enter the damage and harm. This research uses a descriptive-analytic method to study the comparative study of civil liability caused by the actuarial disadvantages of drugs in Iranian law with a view to English law. The results show that the civil liability of Iran and the UK are apparently different. In England, unlike Iranian law, deliberately and unwittingly, they are two independent lawsuits for civil liability. Compensation for mistakes, misdemeanors and neglect the pharmacists' offices in the delivery of medicines are subject to the responsibility of the insurance professional of pharmacy and drag companies, according to the doctor's dossier. According to the Teshibod rule, pharmacists are known as guarantors for consumers and are responsible for compensating them for damages.

Keywords

Main Subjects

OPEN ACCESS

©2024 The author(s). This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

PUBLISHER NOTE

Sami Publishing Company remains neutral concerning jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

CURRENT PUBLISHER

Sami Publishing Company

  1. Bryan A Garner. (2009). Black’s Law Dictionary, Negligence Calnan, Alan, Duty and Integrity in Tort Law, 1st ed. North Carolina, Carolina Academic Press
  2. Cavaliere, Alberto. (2004). "Product Liability in the European Union: Compensation and Deterrence Issues", European Journal of Law and Economics.
  3. Cooke, John. (2010). Law of Tort, ninth revised edn. London, Longman.
  4. Deilami A. (2010). Good will civil liability. Tehran: Mizan Publications.
  5. Delaney, Helen, Rene van de Zande, A. (2001). Guide to the EU Directive Concerning Liability for Defective Products (Product Liability Directive), vol: 1, National Institute of Standards and Technology.
  6. Ebrahimi N. (2003). Legal analysis of responsibility for the provision of goods and defective consumer protection. Tehran: Samt.
  7. Ebrahimi N. (2007). Responsible for producing defective products and the protection of consumers in the legal system. Journal of Law and Political Science.
  8. Elliott, Catherine & Quinn, Frances. (2009). Tort Law, 7th ed. Edinburgh, Pearson Longman
  9. Fatemi SA. (2014). Technical allowed pharmacists ensure patients' rights. Tehran: Mehr Publication.
  10. Fischer, David A. and Powers, William. (1994). Product liability: Cases and Materials; Second Edition, West Publishing CoG Edward White, Tort Law in America.
  11. Geistfed, Mark A. (2009). The value of consumer choice in products liability; New York University School of Law, Brooklyn Law Review, Vol 74, Berkeley electronic press.Gerald Postema, Philosophy and the law of Torts.
  12. Golpayegani M. (1409). Majma Ul Masael. Qom: Dar Ul Ghoran Publication.
  13. Jafari Tabar H. (1996). Responsablity of producers and sellers of goods. Tehran: Dadgostar Publication.
  14. Jan Kennedy, Andrew Grubb. (1998). Principles of Medical Law, London: Oxford University press.John Cartwright, Stefan Vogenaur, Simon Whittaker, Reforming the French law of
  15. Kashef Ghita Najafi M. (2001). Thryralmjlh. Najaf: Almrtzvyh Almktbh ..
  16. Katouzian N. (2015). General rules of contracts. Tehran: Tehran University
  17. Katouzian N. (2014). Specific contracts. Tehran: University Publications.
  18. Kennedy J. Grubb A. (1998). Principles of Medical Law (Great Britain). London: Oxford University press.
  19. Kennedy J. Grubb A. (1998). Principles of Medical Law (Great Britain). London: Oxford University press.
  20. Khan, Malcolm, Robson, Michelle& Swift, Kristina. (2002). Clinical Negligence, 2ndedn. London, Cavendish.
  21. Magnus U. (2010). Why is US tort law so different? Journal of European Tort Law.
  22. Markesinis, Basil S. &Unbearth, Hannes. (2002). the German Law of Torts, 4thedn. Oxford, Hart Publication.
  23. Miller, Nelson P. (2006). “An Ancient Law of Care”, Whitter Law Review, Vol.26, 3.
  24. Lamond, Grant, what is a crime? Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, VOL. 27, NO.4, 2007, 612
  25. Lorber, Leah, Product Liability in Europe and the Role of the European Commission Global Liability Issue, Vol. 1, 2001.
  26. Mirzaye Ghomi A. Jame Ul-Shatat. Tehran: Keyhan Institute; 1413. 3 p.448
  27. Mohaqeq Damad M. (2010). A warning role in the disclaimer. Tehran: Islamic Publications.
  28. Mohaqeq Helli H. (2011). Sharaye alislam. Tehran: Esteqlal publications. Vol.4 p.329
  29. Shafa'i M. (2000). Comparative analysis of changing conditions in contracts. Tehran: Phoenix Publications.
  30. SHahide Sani Z. (2013). Alrozeh Albahiah. Qom: Davari publications. Vol.10.
  31. Shaykh Mufid M. (2005). Almqnh. Qom: Islamic Publications.
  32. Shojapourian S. (1994). Civil liability arising from errors in physicians' job. Tehran: Ferdosi Publication.
  33. Stanton, John. (2007). Strict Liability: stigma and regret, Oxford Journal of legal studies, VOL.27, NO.1.
  34. Yazdi O. (2015). Silence in the contract. Tehran: Ava Publications.
  35. Mazeaud (H, L ET J). (1985). Leçon de droit civil, Obligations. Tome.2. 7e édition, Volume première par François Chabas, Paris Menthriestien.
  36. Jolwicz (W). (1994). on tort. By w. v. h. Rogers. 14th edition London Sweet and. Maxwell. 1994, p. 501, cité par Tunc (A.), op.cit. n 39, p. 36.
  37. Le tourneau, Philippe. (1976). La responsabilite civile, Paris, Dalloz.
  38. Duhamel (O). (1992). ET Meny (Y.) Dictionnaire constitutionnel p u. f.
  39. Esmein (P). (1934).Troit problèmes de responsabilité civile. Revue Trimestrielle de droit civil.
  40. Yeo, Tiong. (2008). "The Efect of Contract on the Law Governing, Clam In Tort And Equity", Year Book Of Private International Law, ed Andred Bonomi & Paul Volken, St mpfi Publisher. Berne, Germany.
  41. Mayss, Abla. (1996). Principles of Conflict of Law, Cavendish Publishing Limited, Second edition, London.
  42. Milis, Alex. (2009). The Confluence of Public and Private International Law, First Published, Cambridge University, Press, United kingdom.
  43. Gottschalk, Eckart & Michaels, Ralf & Ruhl, Glesela & Von hein, Jan. (2007). Conflict of Laws in a Globalized World, First published, Cambridge University press, United Kingdom.
  44. Collier, J, G. (2001). Conflict of Laws, Third edition, Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom.
  45. Chuoh, Jason & kaczowska, Alina. (2000). Confict of Laws, Second edition, Cavendish Publishing Limited, London.