Document Type : Original Article
Author
M.Sc. in Law, Private Law, Islamic Azad University, Damavand Branch, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
Objective: In international arbitration, three objecting techniques to the arbitral awards are distinguished as appeal, adjuration, and annulment. Although no particular definitions of the above-mentioned terms have been expressed through terminology, they have the profound distinctions and differences and it was unknown to the court as well as to the protesting party.
Findings: The reviewing authority is the same court which issued the verdict. Likewise, an appeal is based on both the legitimacy review of the decision-making process and a review of judgment merits which will be disposed in a higher court.
Conflict of Interest: The author declares no conflict of interest in the proposed study.
Keywords
- Arbitration
- International arbitration
- International commercial arbitration
- Objection to arbitral awards
Main Subjects
OPEN ACCESS
©2024 The author(s). This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
PUBLISHER NOTE
Sami Publishing Company remains neutral concerning jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
CURRENT PUBLISHER
- Societe Hilmarton Itd. V. societe OTV, French supreme Court March 23/1994 xlx Y.B.com. Arbitration. 1994. P.665
- (Société polish ocean line V.Société Jolasiy, French court supreme, March 10/1993, Y. B. Comm. Arb: 1994: P. 662)
- .International Studard Electric Corporation v. Bridas Sociedad Anonima petrolera, Industry y Commercial (1992) 745 F. supp. 172p. 178.
- Article V€: “the award... had been set aside or suspended by a competent authority of the country in which, or under the law of which, that award was made”
- Chromalloy Acroservices Inc. V. The Arab republic of Egypt Court of appeal January 14, 1997. Y.B.xxII comm. Arb. 1997.PP92-93
- Docision of December 6 1988 Le. Tramnsportet La Commercialisationdes Hyarocarburs (sanatrach) v. ford Bacom and davis Inc. x V. Y. b. com. Arb. 1990. P. 370
- M. (1982) “About The Nature National Or A-National, Contractual Or Jurisdictional" Of ICC Awards Under The New York Convention“ Art Of Arbitration: Essays On International Arbitration Liber Amicourum, Pieter Sanders, Netherlands Kluwer Law And Taxation Publishers. 1982.p.131
- Gao Wei, “On the Nationality of Arbitration Awards: The "Dual Standard" in Chinese Law", Journal of Northwest University, No. 5, 2011, pp. 153-158.
- H.G. (2002), Effectiveness Of The Annulment Of An Arbitral Award, Kluwer Law International, The Hague. P.48.
- H.G. (2002), Effectiveness Of The Annulment Of An Arbitral Award, Kluwer Law International, The Hague. P.48.
- H.G. (2002), Effectiveness Of The Annulment Of An Arbitral Award, Kluwer Law International, The Hague. cit, P. 78.
- H.G. (2002), Effectiveness Of The Annulment Of An Arbitral Award, Kluwer Law International, The Hague. cit, P. 78.
- H.G. (2002), Effectiveness Of The Annulment Of An Arbitral Award, Kluwer Law International, The Hague, P. 81.
- Lastaneouse Pierre, (1999) “Why Setting Aside Of An Award Is Not Enough To Domove It From The International Arbitration, 16(2), Kluwer Law International.Printed In Great Britain,p.25.
- Sanders, P (1976 to date) yearbook: Commercial Arbitration
- Societe polish ocean line V Societe tolasry
- UNCTAD, Recognition and Enformation of Arbitral Awards: the New York Convention, UN, New York, 2003, p. 30.
- Van Den Berg, A.J. (1981) the New York Convention of 1958, Kluwer. p.333.
- Van Den Berg, A.J. (1981) the New York Convention of 1958, Kluwer. p.337
- Van Den Berg, A.J. (1981) the New York Convention of 1958, Kluwer. op.cit.351.
- Vladimir Pavic, “Annulment of Arbitral Awards in International commercial Arbitration”, ion christina Knahr et al (ed). Investment and commercrial Arbitration – similarties and divergences, Eleven International Publishing, The Netherlamnsds, 2010, p. 134.
- Zdravilisce “Radenska (slovenia) V.Kajo-ErZ eujnisse Essenzen Gmb H (Austria) decision of October (20, 1993, xx IV. Y. B. com. Arb, 1999. P. 920)
- Zdravilisce “Radenska (slovenia) V.Kajo-ErZ eujnisse Essenzen Gmb H (Austria) decision of October (20, 1993, xx IV. Y. B. com. Arb, 1999. P. 920)
)