MSRT, Noormagz, Civilica, Magiran, ...

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Master of Theology, Jurisprudence and Fundamentals of Islamic Law, University of Qom, Qom, Iran

Abstract

The purpose of the present study is to examine the points of commonality and points of difference regarding civil liability caused by genetic defects in Iranian law with a view to Imami jurisprudence. The findings show that in many countries, to compensate for this type of damage, a responsibility separate from the general civil responsibility has been formed; But in domestic law, in the existing doctrine, a consensus has been formed in the inadequacy of the general rules of responsibility in this area; The consensus that believes in the separation of the nature of personal losses from environmental losses and the necessity of constant compensation for these types of losses, but what is different is the justification basis for this responsibility. In the first presented views, some jurists have introduced risk theory as a justifying factor; But some others have tried either by referring to scattered jurisprudential texts which, in their view, indicate unconditional responsibility in public spheres, or by referring to the jurisprudential rule of respect for property, which is both the rule of loss and non-loss, to provide maximum support for pure liability. Accept from the environment. A group also considered the growing social needs to be sufficient for designing an exceptional system of responsibility in this field, and believed in establishing a system of pure responsibility by the legislator

Keywords

Main Subjects

OPEN ACCESS

©2023 The author(s). This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

PUBLISHER NOTE

Sami Publishing Company remains neutral concerning jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

CURRENT PUBLISHER

Sami Publishing Company

 

 

  1. امامی، سید حسن. (1389). «مسئولیت مدنی»، نشریه دانشکده حقوق دانشگاه ملی ایران، تهران، ش 1.
  2. جعفری لنگرودی، محمدجعفر. (1383). ترمینولوژی حقوق، چاپ دهم، تهران، انتشارات کتابخانه گنج دانش.
  3. دروگری، ریحانه؛ حکیم زاده خویی، پیمان. (1394). «مطالعه تطبیقی قوانین منع تبعیض ژنتیکی در امور استخدامی و بیمه»، مجله حقوق پزشکی، شماره .
  4. صفایی، حسین. (1389).‌ مفاهیم و ضوابط جدید در حقوق مدنی، تهران، مرکز تحقیقات اسلامی.
  5. عباسی، محمود. (1383). «حقوق پزشکی (مجموعه مقالات)»، ج 6، چاپ اول، تهران، انتشارات حقوقی.
  6. کاتوزیان، ناصر. (1386). ضمان قهری، چاپ اول، تهران، انتشارات دانشگاه تهران.
  7. کاتوزیان، ناصر. (1374). وقایع حقوقی، چاپ دوم، تهران، نشر یلدا.
  8. متولی زاده اردکانی، علی. (1388). «ژنتیک، رفتار و فرهنگ»، فصلنامه اخلاق پزشکی، سال سوم.
  9. مرقس، سلیمان. (1999). الوافی فی شرح قانون المدنی فی الالتزامات فی الفعل الضار و المسئو لیه المدنیه، قاهره، جلد 1، چاپ 5.
  10. هاشمی، سید احمدعلی. (1387). «سیر تحولات نظری در مسئله وحدت یا تعدد مسئولیت قراردادی و مسئولیت خارج قرارداد در حقوق فرانسه، فصلنامه رهنمون، سال هفتم، شماره اول و دوم.