MSRT, Noormagz, Civilica, Magiran, ...

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Ph.D. in Theology, Jurisprudence and Fundamentals of Islamic Law, University of Sistan and Baluchistan, Sistan and Baluchistan, Iran

2 Assistant Professor of Private Law, Islamic Azad University, North Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran

3 Ph.D. in Theology, Jurisprudence and Fundamentals of Islamic Law, Mazandaran University, Mazandaran, Iran

Abstract

The dissolution of contracts has many reasons. Some of the reasons for dissolution of contracts in Iranian and French law cause the termination of the transaction. Sale is a condition and condition is rescinded. In French law, the condition of rescission is similar to the option of a condition. It has not been done. Therefore, by using the descriptive-analytical method and by referring to the library and checking the available sources, we conducted a research in this field that basically what is the ratio between the condition of rescission and sale of the condition in the two laws. After the investigations, it was found that the condition of sale and the condition of cancellation are similar to each other in terms of the transfer effects on the sale and the price, but they are different in terms of authenticity and legitimacy in terms of narrative evidence, however, it seems that the legitimacy of the condition of cancellation Based on specific evidence indicating the condition of sale, it can be proved with a little tolerance. It was also found that the scope of influence and the possibility of cancellation of transactions based on the cancellation condition is more than the selling condition. In fact, the limits of authority to terminate the transaction in the sale of the condition are only in the seller's power and limited to the condition of transfer of the price, while in the condition of termination, the parties can cancel and there is no limit of transfer based on the condition of the price

Keywords

Main Subjects

OPEN ACCESS

©2023 The author(s). This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

PUBLISHER NOTE

Sami Publishing Company remains neutral concerning jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

CURRENT PUBLISHER

Sami Publishing Company

  1. , Beale. (2006). 'La réforme du droit Français des contrats et le “droit européen des contrats” : perspective de la Law Commission anglaise' RDC.146.55
  2. A, Benabent. (2010). Droit civil, Les obligations (12th edn Montchrestien, Paris) [279] - [285] ; O Deshayes, T Genicon and Y-M Laithier, Réforme du droit des contrats, du régime général et de la preuve des obligations, Commentaire article par article (LexisNexis, Paris 2016).
  3. R, Cassin. (1945). 'Réflexions sur la résolution judiciaire des contrats pour inexécution' RTD civ.12.
  4. J, Rochfeld. (2003). 'Résolution et exception d'inexécution' in P Rémy-Corlay and D Fenouillet (eds), Les concepts contractuels français à l'heure des Principes du droit européen des contrats. Dalloz Paris.
  5. E, McKendrick. (2016). Contract Law, Text, Cases, and Materials (7th edn OUP, Oxford), p 740-2.
  6. P, Stoffel-Munck. (2016). 'L'imprévision et la réforme des effets du contrat', RCD Hors-Série.